Mixed Hegselmann-Krause Dynamics III
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26713/cma.v16i1.2957Keywords:
Mixed Hegselmann-Krause dynamics, Hegselmann-Krause model, Deffuant model, Social network, Heterogeneous interaction modeAbstract
The mixed Hegselmann-Krause (HK) model encompasses both the Deffuant and HK models. Building upon our previous work (Mixed Hegselmann-Krause dynamics II, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B 28(5) (2023), 2981 – 2993), we delve into the mixed HK model within a heterogeneous interaction framework. This involves either pair interaction, where all interacting pairs approach each other equally at their rate, or group interaction at each time step. Our research focuses on identifying circumstances conducive to consensus formation within this heterogeneous interaction paradigm. Furthermore, we delve into pair interaction scenarios where interacting pairs can approach each other at distinct rates. This differs from the Deffuant model, where an interacting pair can only approach each other at the same rate under a homogeneous threshold. Our investigation also aims to elucidate the conditions under which consensus can be attained under pair interaction with distinct approaching rates.
Downloads
References
C. Bernardo, F. Vasca and R. Iervolino, Heterogeneous opinion dynamics with confidence thresholds adaptation, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems 9(3) (2022), 1068 – 1079, DOI: 10.1109/TCNS.2021.3088790.
A. Bhattacharyya, M. Braverman, B. Chazelle and H. L. Nguyen, On the convergence of the Hegselmann-Krause system, in: Proceedings of the 4th conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS’13), pp. 61 – 66, (2013), DOI: 10.1145/2422436.2422446.
G. Chen, W. Su, W. Mei and F. Bullo, Convergence properties of the heterogeneous Deffuant–Weisbuch model, Automatica 114 (2020), 108825, DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2020.108825.
J. Cox and R. Durrett, Nonlinear voter models, in: Random Walks, Brownian Motion, and Interacting Particle Systems, R. Durrett and H. Kesten (editors), Progress in Probability series, Vol. 28. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, (1991), DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0459-6_8.
G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard and G. Weisbuch, Mixing beliefs among interacting agents, Advances in Complex Systems 3(01n04) (2000), 87 – 98, DOI: 10.1142/S0219525900000078.
S. Fortunato, On the consensus threshold for the opinion dynamics of Krause–Hegselmann, International Journal of Modern Physics C 16(02) (2005), 259 – 270, DOI: 10.1142/S0129183105007078.
R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(3) (2002), 1 – 33, URL: https://www.jasss.org/5/3/2/2.pdf.
H.-L. Li, Mixed Hegselmann-Krause dynamics, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B 27(2) (2022), 1149 – 1162, DOI: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021084.
H.-L. Li, Mixed Hegselmann-Krause dynamics II, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B 28(5) (2023), 2981 – 2993, DOI: 10.3934/dcdsb.2022200.
J. Lorenz, A stabilization theorem for dynamics of continuous opinions, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 355(1) (2005), 217 – 223, DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2005.02.086.
J. Lorenz, Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey, International Journal of Modern Physics C 18(12) (2007), 1819 – 1838, DOI: 10.1142/S0129183107011789.
R. Parasnis, M. Franceschetti and B. Touri, Hegselmann-Krause dynamics with limited connectivity, in: 2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (Miami, FL, USA, 2018), pp. 5364- – 369, (2018), DOI: 10.1109/CDC.2018.8618877.
A. V. Proskurnikov and R. Tempo, A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I, Annual Reviews in Control 43 (2017), 65 – 79, DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.03.002.
Y. Shang, Deffuant model with general opinion distributions: First impression and critical confidence bound, Complexity 19(2) (2013), 38 – 49, DOI: 10.1002/cplx.21465.
Y. Shang, Deffuant model of opinion formation in one-dimensional multiplex networks, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 48(39) (2015), 395101, DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/48/39/395101.
F. Vasca, C. Bernardo and R. Iervolino, Practical consensus in bounded confidence opinion dynamics, Automatica 129 (2021), 109683, DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2021.109683.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CCAL that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
